Quality comparison BRAVIA vs AMOLED, Arc S vs Galaxy S 2 (both screens on 100% brightness) Video Clips. Duration : 1.00 Mins.
This is the same video file played on both devices with brightness on both on 100% (as seen at the end of the video) Whilst the AMOLED on the Samsung shows the colours more (overly) saturated, it loses a lot of definition compared to the Arc S' Mobile Bravia Engine LED backlit LCD.
Tags: Mobile Bravia Engine, Sony, Sony Ericsson, Android, Smart phone, Samsung, Galaxy S 2, Galaxy S II, LCD vs AMOLED, Super LCD vs AMOLED, LED backlit LCD vs AMOLED, BRAVIA vs AMOLED, BRAVIA vs super AMOLED, Sony vs Samsung
Motorola Atrix 4G vs Samsung Galaxy S 2 Tube. Duration : 12.98 Mins.
More news/reviews here: bit.ly Both the Motorola Atrix 4G and Samsung Galaxy S 2 pack dual core processors: the Tegra 2 1GHz in the former, and the 1.2GHz Exynos in the latter. In this video we run benchmarks, check available RAM after start up, compare specs, see which one opens apps faster, and check web-browsing performance. The Atrix 4G has qHD resolution on its 4.0" LCD display. It has a 5MP camera with LED flash. It can take 720p video at 30fps. The battery is 1930mAh. There's 1GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage. The Atrix is running Android 2.2. The Galaxy S II has a WVGA 4.3" Super AMOLED Plus screen. It has an 8MP camera with LED flash that can take 1080p video at 30fps. The battery is 1650mAh. There's also 1GB of RAM, and you get two versions, one with 16GB and one with 32GB for storage. The Galaxy S 2 is running Android 2.3 Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com
Keywords: atrix 4g vs samsung galaxy s 2, galaxy s 2, galaxy s ii, samsung, motorola, atrix, 4g, atrix 4g, dual-core, comparison, vs, vs., versus, galaxy s 2 vs. atrix 4g, review, smartphone, android, speed test, speedtest, samsung galaxy s 2, motorola atrix 4g, motorola atrix
